The Relationship Between Reasoning About Privacy and Default Logics
نویسندگان
چکیده
There is now an incredible wealth of data about individuals, businesses and organizations. This data is freely available over the Internet to almost anyone willing to pay for it, independently of whether they are identity thieves or credit card scam artists or legitimate users. This has led to a growing need for privacy. In this paper, we first present a simple logical model of privacy. We then show that the problem of privacy may be reduced to that of brave reasoning in default logic theories, thus reducing this important problem to a well understood reasoning paradigm. By leveraging this reduction, we are able to develop an efficient privacy preservation algorithm and a set of complexity results for privacy preservation.
منابع مشابه
ropositional its Jonathan Stillman
We characterize the complexity of several typical problems in propositional default logics. In particular, we examine the complexity of extension membership, extension existence, and extension entailment problems. We show that the extension existence problem is X; complete, even for semi-normal theories, and that the extension membership and entailment problems are X; complete and II; complete ...
متن کاملModal Logics for Qualitative Possibility and Beliefs
Possibilistic logic has been proposed as a nu merical formalism for reasoning with uncertainty. There has been interest in developing qualitative accounts of possibility, as well as an explana tion of the relationship between possibility and modal logics. We present two modal logics that can be used to represent and reason with qual itative statements of possibility and necessity. Within thi...
متن کاملFrom Query Answering to Satissability in Nonmonotonic Logics
We propose a unifying view of negation as failure, integrity constraints, and epistemic queries in nonmonotonic reasoning. Specii-cally, we study the relationship between satis-ability and logical implication in nonmono-tonic logics, showing that, in many nonmono-tonic formalisms, it is possible and easy to reduce logical implication to satissability. This result not only allows for establishin...
متن کاملTwo-phase Exception Logic
In this paper we propose an exception logic { formalizing reasoning about exceptions. We use this logic to defend two claims. First, we argue that default logic { formalizing reasoning about default assumptions { is an extension of exception logic. A deconstruction argument shows that reasoning about exceptions is one of the rst principles of reasoning about default assumptions. Second, we argu...
متن کاملNonmonotonie Default Modal Logics (detailed Abstract)
Conclusions by failure to prove the opposite are frequently used in reasoning about an incompletely specified world. This naturally leads to logics for default reasoning which, in general, are nonmonotonic, i.e., inlzoducing new facts can invalidate previously made conclusions. Accordingly, a nonmonotonic theory is called (nonmonotonically) degenerate, if adding new axioms does not invalidate a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005